Latest News

Home » Vintage Camera sample pictures » Voigtlander samples » Voigtlander Bessa 66 sample pictures

Voigtlander Bessa 66 sample pictures

Over the last few weeks I’ve been carrying my Voigtlander Bessa 66 folding camera with me loaded with a reel of Ilford HP5+ in order to test how the camera performs. Being a very old camera (made sometime between 1938 and 1941) it’s always possible that there is a leak in the bellows, a problem with the lens or some other issue and there may be nothing on the negatives at all, but that moment of extracting the developed film out of the tank is one of the main thrills of trying out old cameras.

I found the Bessa 66 easy to carry around because it’s quite a small camera for the size of negative it produces, slips easily into the coat pocket and is quite quick to open and unfold. The viewfinder was a bit hit and miss because it’s just a frame, but the shutter release, being part of the lens cover, was very easy to use and fell in just the right place.

I have a bit more experience with a folding camera since my last test film in my Selfix 1620, so I found the process of remembering to set the exposure, cock the shutter & set the focus a bit easier but I still found after processing the film that a couple of shots were completely under exposed so I have a bit more learning to do on that score.

Film Development

After I’d completed the roll I loaded up my Patterson System 3 tank and developed the film in Ilford ID11 developer at a dilution of 1:1 for 12 minutes @ 20 °C and  fixed the film for 6 min in a fresh mix of Ilford Rapid fixer at 1:4. After the final wash I tried wiping the excess water off with my fingers acting as a film squeegee; someone on the vintage film group on facebook recommended this as a way to avoid drying marks and I think it was successful because there were less marks on this film than the last I developed.

The only remarkable event in the development was that for some reason it was a real pain loading the tank, with the film buckling and refusing to fit within the guides – I think it’s time I bought a more modern tank.

Once the film was washed and dried I cut it into 4 strips of 3 negatives and scanned them on an Epson V550 perfection scanner in 48 bit depth as black and white negatives. I turned off all the automatic features that the Epson software offers and imported the tiff format scans into Lightroom for post processing.

During post processing I did a bit of cleanup of some dust spots (particularly on the first scan because I forgot to clean the scanner glass 🙁 ), and added some contrast, clarity and a bit of noise reduction and sharpening.

Voigtlander Bessa 66 sample pictures

The results of my test roll are shown below. Overall they reveal the Bessa 66 to be a snapshot camera rather than a serious photographic tool, but I suppose that is no big surprise. Although my initial reaction to the scans was one of disappointment, especially regarding the amount of vignetting displayed, on reflection they are really what I should have expected. At the time this camera was sold, most photographs were contact prints and therefore the cameras didn’t need to have lenses capable of huge amounts of resolving power or contrast. Looked at them in this light, the pictures below are reasonable quality snaps.


How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?


I’m a software developer by profession but I’ve been taking pictures since I was about 8 years old. In that time I’ve owned cameras of all types and sizes from 120 roll film thro’ 35mm to my current Pentax K-5, Ricoh GXR + P10/S10/A12 28mm/A12 50mm, Canon S95 and recently acquired Sony NEX 6.

  1. Great little camera – I have one myself.

  2. John Nigel Thomas says:

    I have a similar Bessa with the uncoated Skopar 75mm. My lens produces much sharper pictures than your examples so I imagine you have either the Voigtar lens or the Vaskar. I have used the Vaskar on a later 6×6 Perkeo and it is also very sharp centrally but softer toward the edges so the Voigtar seems the more likely lens on your camera, if this helps your identification.
    I find the simple pop-up viewfinder to be the best on any camera that I own from that era; it gives a large, bright image that accurately frames the subject, and is simple to keep clean and clear. The fact it is such a light, compact little camera makes it so easy to carry about.
    I love the tonality of the uncoated lens on colour film, preferring it to the slightly higher contrast a coated lens will give. I just have to be aware of flare if a strong light-source is in front of the camera.
    With a little exercise the synchro-compur shutter is very consistent, if consistently a little slow at all speeds. On colour negative film this can be an advantage but I need to be aware of the possibility of camera shake. One tip I have learned from experience is to use my Bessa on its side, so the viewfinder is in front of my right eye and the shutter release is on the top. This way I can brace the camera against my nose and forehead which gives me sharp pictures every time.
    Enjoy your Bessa, they don’t make them like this any more!

Leave a Reply

  • Keep up with all the latest posts by subscribing to the blog


  • Top rated posts

  • Top Posts & Pages

    Petri FTII 35mm review and repair
    Olympus OM-20 35mm slr review
    Praktica B200 electronic camera review
    Building my amazing Dunster House Log Cabin - Part 1
    My Dunster House log cabin build - part 2
    The Minolta Dynax 404 si 35 mm plastic SLR Camera
%d bloggers like this: